SimpleEnglish: Improving Technical Writing with Checkable Rules
Purpose, mechanisms, getting started and boundaries
Source: AminBlg/SimpleEnglish · AminBlg
User Problem
Positioning and task fit“Write clearly” is an abstract request. SimpleEnglish turns technical-writing constraints into an Agent Skill: simpler sentence structure, explicit actors, consistent terms and conditions before commands. It targets READMEs, procedures, errors and release notes. Understanding it requires examining the rules, installation form and what its published experiments actually measured.
- Rewrite English procedures into executable steps
- Standardize terminology for non-native readers
- Remove decorative language from errors and release notes
Product Mechanism
Capabilities and execution- Rules are more concrete than adjectivesRules favor active voice, simple tenses and stable word meanings, with different treatment for descriptive and procedural text. Review can inspect actors, conditions and terminology instead of debating whether prose feels natural. Source
- Plain and Strict serve different needsPlain targets general readers by default. Explicit STE or compliance requests activate Strict vocabulary discipline. Their goals differ, and ordinary software documentation should preserve meaning while choosing the appropriate register. Source
- Preserve technical invariantsThe skill explicitly preserves code, identifiers, commands, paths, quoted errors and facts. This is the essential boundary in technical editing: prose can become simpler without rewriting interfaces or conditions. Source
- Skill and plugin installations differThe skills CLI installs the skill itself. Session hooks and the Claude Code output style require the plugin path. Setting outputStyle after a skill-only install does not create plugin behavior. Source
Workflow
Start with a small task- Select a textChoose an English document with real commands, error messages and prerequisites, and preserve the original. Specify its readers and technical facts that must not change.
- Install for the hostUse the command below for the general skill. Read the plugin instructions if you need persistent output styling, then confirm the host discovers simple-english.
- Name the mode and taskRequest a Plain rewrite of a runbook, or explicitly request Strict checking. Keep brand copy and operational instructions separate.
- Check semantic preservationCompare commands, arguments, negation, conditions and numbers before judging readability. A reader following the procedure provides stronger evidence than formatting counts alone.
The trial sequence and checks are editorial guidance. Entry commands follow official documentation; this project was not executed for the article. Source
Official entry example
npx skills add AminBlg/SimpleEnglishComplete the prerequisites above first. Examples contain no real credentials.
Limits and Boundaries
Constraints and selection| Boundary | Meaning | Suggested action |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental version | The README says the published reply experiment used an earlier version, with no equivalent run for later versions. Source | Do not transfer the old improvement percentage to the current version or all models. |
| Standard and certification | The author explicitly denies STE certification and describes the project as unofficial. Source | Consult the official standard when conformity matters; a skill is not an audit. |
Scroll horizontally to view the full table
It suits writers and teams seeking consistent technical English. Its strong constraints on persuasion make document type an important selection criterion.
How to Evaluate Adoption
Trial scenario and verificationTry a database-migration procedure: environment and backup conditions first, then commands, expected output and recovery. After rewriting, check that mandatory backup and conditional retries remain intact. If the source does not explain a failure cause, the rewrite must not invent one.
Acceptance requires unchanged commands, preserved facts, conditions before actions and discoverable recovery steps. A cleaner-looking text that drops a limitation fails.
Evidence: Pinned README · Supporting official documentation · Current repository。
Source fetched (UTC): 2026-11-02T07:26:40.133Z；snapshot commit: a6fcb4fde098。The source date denotes the repository snapshot commit, not the project’s original launch.